Applicability
When a guideline is issued or revised, compliance must decide whether it applies, to which entities, and why. Here the rules suggest an answer with cited reasons, a stored AI draft gives a second view, and a person decides.
Demo
| By hand | With a record like this | |
|---|---|---|
| Spotting what applies | Each publication is read against the group by hand | Each is screened per entity, against its regulatory status and AI uses |
| Showing the reasoning | Reconstructed later, when someone asks | Every suggestion cites paragraph and page; every decision keeps its reason |
| When the facts change | Stale decisions are found only by re-reading them | The decision reopens and names the fact that changed |
What does not change: the decision. Rules and AI drafts suggest. A named person decides, and the rules say Check where the call is a judgement for Legal.
Position at a glance
What the rules suggest for this profile, before anyone decidesFirm profile
The facts the rules read; change any of them to see the suggestions moveRegulatory status, authorised activities and AI uses
Screen and decide
Opens on the MAS AI risk guidelines; the full list is on the left, newest edition firstDecision log
Recorded as the work is done, in this browser| When | Publication | Decision | Entities | Rules said | AI draft said | Reason | Role |
|---|